<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459750</link>
    <description>Delhi HC declined to continue interim order in competition law matter involving software suppliers for electronic payment solutions. CCI&#039;s final order dated 13.01.2015 found no dominance or abuse of dominant position by respondents, and no contravention of Competition Act Sections 3 and 4. Single Judge discontinued interim relief allowing banks to take customization services from appellant regarding respondents&#039; software. Division Bench upheld Single Judge&#039;s discretion, finding balance of convenience not favoring appellant and rejecting claims of irreparable damage. Appeal disposed of without interference in interim order discontinuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:20:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459750</link>
      <description>Delhi HC declined to continue interim order in competition law matter involving software suppliers for electronic payment solutions. CCI&#039;s final order dated 13.01.2015 found no dominance or abuse of dominant position by respondents, and no contravention of Competition Act Sections 3 and 4. Single Judge discontinued interim relief allowing banks to take customization services from appellant regarding respondents&#039; software. Division Bench upheld Single Judge&#039;s discretion, finding balance of convenience not favoring appellant and rejecting claims of irreparable damage. Appeal disposed of without interference in interim order discontinuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>