<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (10) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39915</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 5(1)(xxi) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment year 1957-58. The court emphasized interpreting the main provision and proviso harmoniously and clarified the distinction between &quot;setting up&quot; a unit and &quot;commencing operations for the establishment&quot; of a unit. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (10) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39915</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming the respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 5(1)(xxi) of the Wealth-tax Act for the assessment year 1957-58. The court emphasized interpreting the main provision and proviso harmoniously and clarified the distinction between &quot;setting up&quot; a unit and &quot;commencing operations for the establishment&quot; of a unit. The appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>