https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459748 A partition or compromise made after publication of a notification under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 could not be recognised to reduce the notified holding. Section 12 bars any transfer, sub-division or partition of notified land after the Section 11 notification unless prior permission is obtained, and declares contrary transactions void and inoperative. A private compromise entered into after notification therefore cannot alter the holding for statutory purposes, and the plea of relation back to an earlier suit date was rejected because it cannot override an express legislative prohibition. The post-notification compromise was ineffective and could not be used to defeat acquisition. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 15:15:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459748 A partition or compromise made after publication of a notification under the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 could not be recognised to reduce the notified holding. Section 12 bars any transfer, sub-division or partition of notified land after the Section 11 notification unless prior permission is obtained, and declares contrary transactions void and inoperative. A private compromise entered into after notification therefore cannot alter the holding for statutory purposes, and the plea of relation back to an earlier suit date was rejected because it cannot override an express legislative prohibition. The post-notification compromise was ineffective and could not be used to defeat acquisition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459748