https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459740 Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was held inapplicable to an application for arbitration under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. The Court examined the statutory arbitration scheme under Sections 3-G(5) and 3-G(6) of the National Highways Act alongside Sections 2(4), 21 and 43 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and concluded that Section 2(4) excludes the operation of Section 43 in statutory arbitrations governed by another enactment. As a result, the Limitation Act could not be imported to control the special mechanism under the National Highways Act, and a time-bar objection based on Article 137 was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459740 Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was held inapplicable to an application for arbitration under Section 3-G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. The Court examined the statutory arbitration scheme under Sections 3-G(5) and 3-G(6) of the National Highways Act alongside Sections 2(4), 21 and 43 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and concluded that Section 2(4) excludes the operation of Section 43 in statutory arbitrations governed by another enactment. As a result, the Limitation Act could not be imported to control the special mechanism under the National Highways Act, and a time-bar objection based on Article 137 was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459740