https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459741 Order VII Rule 11 permits rejection only of the plaint as a whole; if a cause of action survives against some defendants or properties, the plaint cannot be rejected in part and the suit must continue on the surviving claims. Selective excision was also said to be unavailable on the facts under Order VI Rule 16, which is confined to scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, prejudicial, embarrassing or abusive pleadings, and under Order XIV Rule 2, which concerns preliminary issues of jurisdiction or statutory bar after issues are framed. The challenged order was therefore described as unsustainable under those provisions. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459741 Order VII Rule 11 permits rejection only of the plaint as a whole; if a cause of action survives against some defendants or properties, the plaint cannot be rejected in part and the suit must continue on the surviving claims. Selective excision was also said to be unavailable on the facts under Order VI Rule 16, which is confined to scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, prejudicial, embarrassing or abusive pleadings, and under Order XIV Rule 2, which concerns preliminary issues of jurisdiction or statutory bar after issues are framed. The challenged order was therefore described as unsustainable under those provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459741