https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459743 Delhi HC dismissed CCI's appeal seeking condonation of 67-day delay in filing appeal. Court noted that CCI's counsel had previously stated willingness to furnish investigation documents to respondent (except confidential ones) without creating precedent. This statement was recorded by Single Judge in earlier order dated 02.12.2015. HC found no merit in CCI's submission that the impugned order would have wide ramifications or set precedent, given CCI's own recorded statement. Court held no justification existed to modify the order and found no case for interference on merits. Application for condonation of delay dismissed as meritless, consequently appeal and pending applications also dismissed. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459743 Delhi HC dismissed CCI's appeal seeking condonation of 67-day delay in filing appeal. Court noted that CCI's counsel had previously stated willingness to furnish investigation documents to respondent (except confidential ones) without creating precedent. This statement was recorded by Single Judge in earlier order dated 02.12.2015. HC found no merit in CCI's submission that the impugned order would have wide ramifications or set precedent, given CCI's own recorded statement. Court held no justification existed to modify the order and found no case for interference on merits. Application for condonation of delay dismissed as meritless, consequently appeal and pending applications also dismissed. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459743