<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (10) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39910</link>
    <description>An order recording partition under section 25A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 recognises severance of joint family status for income-tax purposes once the property has been divided in definite portions, including partition between groups of members. After such an order, the original Hindu undivided family ceases to exist for assessment purposes. Section 25A(3) applies only where no partition order has been recorded, and section 34 does not permit reopening, revision, or disregard of a valid partition order. Accordingly, a subsequent assessment could not treat the family as continuing as before, and reassessment as a Hindu undivided family was incompetent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (10) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39910</link>
      <description>An order recording partition under section 25A(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 recognises severance of joint family status for income-tax purposes once the property has been divided in definite portions, including partition between groups of members. After such an order, the original Hindu undivided family ceases to exist for assessment purposes. Section 25A(3) applies only where no partition order has been recorded, and section 34 does not permit reopening, revision, or disregard of a valid partition order. Accordingly, a subsequent assessment could not treat the family as continuing as before, and reassessment as a Hindu undivided family was incompetent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>