https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459739 A plaint in a money suit that is barred on the face of the plaint by the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC because the court is confined to the plaint averments and cannot examine the defence. Order VII Rule 10 CPC applies only where the court lacks territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction and the plaint can be presented elsewhere; a total statutory bar on civil court jurisdiction stands on a different footing. Proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal are commenced by application under Section 19 of the 1993 Act, not by plaint, so return of the plaint was not warranted. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:45:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459739 A plaint in a money suit that is barred on the face of the plaint by the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC because the court is confined to the plaint averments and cannot examine the defence. Order VII Rule 10 CPC applies only where the court lacks territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction and the plaint can be presented elsewhere; a total statutory bar on civil court jurisdiction stands on a different footing. Proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal are commenced by application under Section 19 of the 1993 Act, not by plaint, so return of the plaint was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459739