<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 353 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459737</link>
    <description>Limitation applies to arbitration proceedings, and an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act. The cause of arbitration accrues when the claimant first acquires the right to require arbitration, and limitation runs from that date; repeated reminders do not postpone accrual. On the admitted facts, the demands, repudiations and later final bills showed the claim had become stale before the suits were filed, and later notices could not revive a time-barred claim. Where no subsisting claim survives on the record, the court may refuse reference to arbitration rather than send the parties to an arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 09:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 353 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459737</link>
      <description>Limitation applies to arbitration proceedings, and an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act. The cause of arbitration accrues when the claimant first acquires the right to require arbitration, and limitation runs from that date; repeated reminders do not postpone accrual. On the admitted facts, the demands, repudiations and later final bills showed the claim had become stale before the suits were filed, and later notices could not revive a time-barred claim. Where no subsisting claim survives on the record, the court may refuse reference to arbitration rather than send the parties to an arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>