<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1235 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763655</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on common inputs and input services used in a captive power plant was held admissible to the extent the electricity generated was wheeled to sister concerns, because such generation remained part of the manufacturing activity on the facts presented. Proportionate credit relating to electricity supplied to the residential colony and third parties had already been reversed, leaving only supply to sister units in dispute. Applying the substituted definition of input and cited precedents, the tribunal rejected the demand for reversal, including the attempt to levy reversal at 6% of value on wheeled electricity. The assessee was entitled to the credit, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1235 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763655</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on common inputs and input services used in a captive power plant was held admissible to the extent the electricity generated was wheeled to sister concerns, because such generation remained part of the manufacturing activity on the facts presented. Proportionate credit relating to electricity supplied to the residential colony and third parties had already been reversed, leaving only supply to sister units in dispute. Applying the substituted definition of input and cited precedents, the tribunal rejected the demand for reversal, including the attempt to levy reversal at 6% of value on wheeled electricity. The assessee was entitled to the credit, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>