<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1249 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763669</link>
    <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the NCLT&#039;s rejection of a company petition filed under Section 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant, who was removed from company membership in 2012 through an EOGM decision published in newspapers, failed to demonstrate continued membership status from 2012-2023. With only 97 members at the time of petition filing, the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold requirements. The NCLAT rejected the appellant&#039;s claim of believing he remained a member throughout this period, finding no merit in the appeal and upholding the NCLT&#039;s dismissal on grounds of maintainability and delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:45:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1249 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763669</link>
      <description>The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the NCLT&#039;s rejection of a company petition filed under Section 244(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant, who was removed from company membership in 2012 through an EOGM decision published in newspapers, failed to demonstrate continued membership status from 2012-2023. With only 97 members at the time of petition filing, the appellant did not meet the statutory threshold requirements. The NCLAT rejected the appellant&#039;s claim of believing he remained a member throughout this period, finding no merit in the appeal and upholding the NCLT&#039;s dismissal on grounds of maintainability and delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>