<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1258 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763678</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for services to HLPL and SIMPL were examined against objections based on base erosion, revenue neutrality, mirror ALP and treaty protection; the commentary notes that a corresponding adjustment is not required merely because the AE&#039;s transaction was accepted elsewhere, while the HLPL benchmarking required fresh review on the fixed-versus-optional services comparison. Software licence receipts were treated as not constituting royalty in light of Supreme Court software-payment principles. Global P&amp;T functional services to SIMPL and other service receipts to HLPL and L&amp;T were analysed under the India-Netherlands treaty and section 9(1)(vii), with the make available test and the overseas-source exclusion leading to non-taxability as fees for technical services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1258 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763678</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for services to HLPL and SIMPL were examined against objections based on base erosion, revenue neutrality, mirror ALP and treaty protection; the commentary notes that a corresponding adjustment is not required merely because the AE&#039;s transaction was accepted elsewhere, while the HLPL benchmarking required fresh review on the fixed-versus-optional services comparison. Software licence receipts were treated as not constituting royalty in light of Supreme Court software-payment principles. Global P&amp;T functional services to SIMPL and other service receipts to HLPL and L&amp;T were analysed under the India-Netherlands treaty and section 9(1)(vii), with the make available test and the overseas-source exclusion leading to non-taxability as fees for technical services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>