<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1290 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763710</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice regarding misclassification of Kulcha as bread under GST exemption and denial of input tax credit. The court held the petition non-maintainable as it involved complex questions of fact and law within the adjudicating authority&#039;s jurisdiction under CGST Act, 2017. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is limited to cases involving fundamental rights violations, natural justice breaches, or jurisdictional issues, none of which were established. The petitioner was directed to exhaust statutory remedies including responding to the SCN and participating in adjudication proceedings rather than bypassing the statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1290 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763710</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice regarding misclassification of Kulcha as bread under GST exemption and denial of input tax credit. The court held the petition non-maintainable as it involved complex questions of fact and law within the adjudicating authority&#039;s jurisdiction under CGST Act, 2017. The court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is limited to cases involving fundamental rights violations, natural justice breaches, or jurisdictional issues, none of which were established. The petitioner was directed to exhaust statutory remedies including responding to the SCN and participating in adjudication proceedings rather than bypassing the statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>