https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459705 The Bombay HC rejected BSNL's petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking termination of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council's mandate. The court held that after the Council determined it had jurisdiction to proceed with arbitration, BSNL could not approach the court to terminate the arbitrator's mandate. The Council was entitled to continue proceedings and make an award, with BSNL's remedy being to challenge the final award under Section 16(6) of the MSMED Act. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with proceedings stayed until April 28, 2015. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:36:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459705 The Bombay HC rejected BSNL's petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking termination of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council's mandate. The court held that after the Council determined it had jurisdiction to proceed with arbitration, BSNL could not approach the court to terminate the arbitrator's mandate. The Council was entitled to continue proceedings and make an award, with BSNL's remedy being to challenge the final award under Section 16(6) of the MSMED Act. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable, with proceedings stayed until April 28, 2015. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459705