<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1474 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459708</link>
    <description>HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s properties in Connaught Circus and Connaught Lane are &quot;commercial establishments or complexes&quot; within Section 2(ea)(i)(5) of the Wealth Tax Act and thus outside taxable assets. The court rejected Revenue&#039;s contention that the phrase must be read only in the plural and refused to import additional qualifying features proposed by a Bench, holding no such restrictions exist in the statutory wording and finding no legal infirmity in the ITAT order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1474 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459708</link>
      <description>HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s properties in Connaught Circus and Connaught Lane are &quot;commercial establishments or complexes&quot; within Section 2(ea)(i)(5) of the Wealth Tax Act and thus outside taxable assets. The court rejected Revenue&#039;s contention that the phrase must be read only in the plural and refused to import additional qualifying features proposed by a Bench, holding no such restrictions exist in the statutory wording and finding no legal infirmity in the ITAT order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>