https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459709 Delhi HC dismissed appeal challenging Competition Commission's direction for investigation into alleged price-fixing by manufacturers of oral diabetes drugs containing Vildagliptin API. Court held that under Section 19(1)(a) and 26(1) of the Competition Act, Commission need only satisfy itself of prima facie case before directing Director General to investigate within 60 days. No right to notice or hearing exists at preliminary investigation stage as provision does not contemplate adjudicatory action by Commission. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:36:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459709 Delhi HC dismissed appeal challenging Competition Commission's direction for investigation into alleged price-fixing by manufacturers of oral diabetes drugs containing Vildagliptin API. Court held that under Section 19(1)(a) and 26(1) of the Competition Act, Commission need only satisfy itself of prima facie case before directing Director General to investigate within 60 days. No right to notice or hearing exists at preliminary investigation stage as provision does not contemplate adjudicatory action by Commission. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459709