<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 423 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459704</link>
    <description>Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act presented to a civil court. The Court treated the right to apply as arising when the final bill was passed and the no claim certificate was issued. Because the application was filed more than three years after that point, it was held to be barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 423 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459704</link>
      <description>Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act presented to a civil court. The Court treated the right to apply as arising when the final bill was passed and the no claim certificate was issued. Because the application was filed more than three years after that point, it was held to be barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>