https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13244 Whether an insurer may deny liability under Condition No. 4 for damage occurring after an insured left a vehicle unattended to provide urgent medical assistance; concurrent factual findings that the delay and leaving the vehicle were justified, that the surveyor's attribution of subsequent short circuiting lacked evidence, and that exclusionary clauses must be interpreted with regard to proximate causation led to rejection of the exclusion as a bar to cover. en-us Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:40:19 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:40:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13244 Whether an insurer may deny liability under Condition No. 4 for damage occurring after an insured left a vehicle unattended to provide urgent medical assistance; concurrent factual findings that the delay and leaving the vehicle were justified, that the surveyor's attribution of subsequent short circuiting lacked evidence, and that exclusionary clauses must be interpreted with regard to proximate causation led to rejection of the exclusion as a bar to cover. Articles Other Topics Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:40:19 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=13244