https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84250 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, declining to condone the delay of 156 days in re-filing. The appellant's explanation was found insufficient to condone such a prolonged delay. The NCLAT emphasized adherence to procedural timelines under the IBC, referring to Supreme Court judgments which disallowed extending timelines beyond statutory limits except in limited circumstances not attributable to the litigants. As the appellant failed to provide adequate justification for the inordinate delay of 156 days in re-filing, which appeared aimed at hindering the resolution process, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal. en-us Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:28:11 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84250 The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, declining to condone the delay of 156 days in re-filing. The appellant's explanation was found insufficient to condone such a prolonged delay. The NCLAT emphasized adherence to procedural timelines under the IBC, referring to Supreme Court judgments which disallowed extending timelines beyond statutory limits except in limited circumstances not attributable to the litigants. As the appellant failed to provide adequate justification for the inordinate delay of 156 days in re-filing, which appeared aimed at hindering the resolution process, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal. Highlights IBC Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:28:11 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84250