https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763606 SC set aside HC judgment that had quashed corruption charges against respondent. HC erred in exercising revisional jurisdiction by considering documents not presented to trial court and applying wrong legal standard. HC improperly sought "clinching material" instead of prima facie case standard required under Section 239 CrPC for discharge petitions. HC wrongly interfered with trial court's charge-framing decision under Prevention of Corruption Act after finding prima facie case existed. Appeal allowed, charges reinstated. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763606 SC set aside HC judgment that had quashed corruption charges against respondent. HC erred in exercising revisional jurisdiction by considering documents not presented to trial court and applying wrong legal standard. HC improperly sought "clinching material" instead of prima facie case standard required under Section 239 CrPC for discharge petitions. HC wrongly interfered with trial court's charge-framing decision under Prevention of Corruption Act after finding prima facie case existed. Appeal allowed, charges reinstated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763606