<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1219 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763639</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the impugned order and quashed criminal proceedings under s.276CC, finding the accused had filed a revised income-tax return (albeit belatedly), penalty proceedings had been dropped, and a refund ordered. The Court held continued criminal prosecution unnecessary in view of these facts and the applicable legal principles, concluding the presumption under s.278E was rebutted and no mens rea warranted criminal liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1219 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763639</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the impugned order and quashed criminal proceedings under s.276CC, finding the accused had filed a revised income-tax return (albeit belatedly), penalty proceedings had been dropped, and a refund ordered. The Court held continued criminal prosecution unnecessary in view of these facts and the applicable legal principles, concluding the presumption under s.278E was rebutted and no mens rea warranted criminal liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>