<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39875</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of proceedings under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner&#039;s belief regarding undisclosed income, adherence to natural justice principles, and the validity of the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order under Section 132(5). The petitioners were directed to appeal to the Central Board of Direct Taxes, with costs of Rs. 250 imposed on them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39875</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of proceedings under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner&#039;s belief regarding undisclosed income, adherence to natural justice principles, and the validity of the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order under Section 132(5). The petitioners were directed to appeal to the Central Board of Direct Taxes, with costs of Rs. 250 imposed on them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>