<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1227 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763647</link>
    <description>The HC found that the arrest of the petitioner on the same day as the authorization potentially interfered with the administration of justice and might constitute contempt of court. The court directed the Commissioner to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s objections submitted under the MGST Rules, ensuring a hearing and a speaking order are provided before the next hearing. The matter was adjourned for further consideration on 06 January 2025.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1227 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763647</link>
      <description>The HC found that the arrest of the petitioner on the same day as the authorization potentially interfered with the administration of justice and might constitute contempt of court. The court directed the Commissioner to consider and dispose of the petitioner&#039;s objections submitted under the MGST Rules, ensuring a hearing and a speaking order are provided before the next hearing. The matter was adjourned for further consideration on 06 January 2025.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>