<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1620 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459696</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the intervention and impleadment applications, bringing the intervenor and impleaded party formally into the proceedings. It directed all respondents to file counter affidavits within three weeks, permitted the petitioner to file a rejoinder within four weeks thereafter, and listed the matter after five weeks. Pending further orders, the Court ordered that status quo be maintained in relation to the CRP process, preserving the existing position until the next hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1620 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459696</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the intervention and impleadment applications, bringing the intervenor and impleaded party formally into the proceedings. It directed all respondents to file counter affidavits within three weeks, permitted the petitioner to file a rejoinder within four weeks thereafter, and listed the matter after five weeks. Pending further orders, the Court ordered that status quo be maintained in relation to the CRP process, preserving the existing position until the next hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>