<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 840 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459689</link>
    <description>Interim protection against coercive action for alleged non-payment of lockdown wages was continued after the wage directions under the Disaster Management Act were withdrawn, because disputes for the period they operated still required an interim arrangement. The Court recognised that the lockdown affected both employers and employees, that establishments had differing financial capacity, and that a balance had to be struck between competing claims. It also held that industrial peace could be advanced through negotiation and conciliation before labour authorities, and directed a facilitated process for possible settlement of wage disputes for the lockdown period. No coercive action was to be taken pursuant to the 29.03.2020 notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 840 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459689</link>
      <description>Interim protection against coercive action for alleged non-payment of lockdown wages was continued after the wage directions under the Disaster Management Act were withdrawn, because disputes for the period they operated still required an interim arrangement. The Court recognised that the lockdown affected both employers and employees, that establishments had differing financial capacity, and that a balance had to be struck between competing claims. It also held that industrial peace could be advanced through negotiation and conciliation before labour authorities, and directed a facilitated process for possible settlement of wage disputes for the lockdown period. No coercive action was to be taken pursuant to the 29.03.2020 notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>