https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682 A final judicial direction that had attained finality was binding on the management, and it could not resist compliance on the ground that the workmen had neither resigned nor been formally retrenched. Where the workmen did not consent to serve under the transferee employer, they could not be compelled to continue under a different management against their will and remained entitled to retirement or retrenchment compensation in law. The earlier order directing payment of benefits was therefore enforceable against the management. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682 A final judicial direction that had attained finality was binding on the management, and it could not resist compliance on the ground that the workmen had neither resigned nor been formally retrenched. Where the workmen did not consent to serve under the transferee employer, they could not be compelled to continue under a different management against their will and remained entitled to retirement or retrenchment compensation in law. The earlier order directing payment of benefits was therefore enforceable against the management. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682