<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 891 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeals filed by the employees, directing the company to comply with the HC&#039;s order to pay retirement benefits. The SC emphasized that employees cannot be forced to work under different management without consent and are entitled to compensation. The company was criticized for avoiding compliance, and the SC mandated implementation of the HC&#039;s order within three months. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 891 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeals filed by the employees, directing the company to comply with the HC&#039;s order to pay retirement benefits. The SC emphasized that employees cannot be forced to work under different management without consent and are entitled to compensation. The company was criticized for avoiding compliance, and the SC mandated implementation of the HC&#039;s order within three months. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>