<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763557</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that appellant tour operator was not liable for service tax on outbound tours as these services are performed outside India territory, covered under Export of Service Rules exemption. However, service tax was confirmed on domestic inbound tours provided to Indian travelers, as these fall within Indian territory and attract taxation under tour operator service provisions. The demand for service tax on web design charges was set aside, as domain names do not constitute intellectual property rights or trademarks under applicable law. Appeal was partly allowed with demands on outbound tours and web charges set aside, while domestic tour tax liability was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1137 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763557</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi held that appellant tour operator was not liable for service tax on outbound tours as these services are performed outside India territory, covered under Export of Service Rules exemption. However, service tax was confirmed on domestic inbound tours provided to Indian travelers, as these fall within Indian territory and attract taxation under tour operator service provisions. The demand for service tax on web design charges was set aside, as domain names do not constitute intellectual property rights or trademarks under applicable law. Appeal was partly allowed with demands on outbound tours and web charges set aside, while domestic tour tax liability was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>