<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1142 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763562</link>
    <description>Where disputed service receipts were already covered by an earlier determination of the same Bench, refund computation had to follow that earlier treatment. Outbound call centre services and credit/debit card operations were not sustained as intermediary services, and the service elements were treated as part of the bundled main service. Reimbursements connected with foreign customers visiting India were also treated as linked to the back-office support arrangement and includible in export turnover. The exclusions from export turnover were therefore not upheld on merits, and the original sanctioning authority was directed to recompute the refund claims on that basis, without any additional refund payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1142 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763562</link>
      <description>Where disputed service receipts were already covered by an earlier determination of the same Bench, refund computation had to follow that earlier treatment. Outbound call centre services and credit/debit card operations were not sustained as intermediary services, and the service elements were treated as part of the bundled main service. Reimbursements connected with foreign customers visiting India were also treated as linked to the back-office support arrangement and includible in export turnover. The exclusions from export turnover were therefore not upheld on merits, and the original sanctioning authority was directed to recompute the refund claims on that basis, without any additional refund payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>