<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763569</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking indemnification from BCCI was held not maintainable because BCCI was treated as not falling within Article 12 and the claim did not arise from discharge of any public function. The Court also held that a writ of mandamus could not be issued directing BCCI to pay a FEMA penalty imposed on the petitioner, describing that relief as misconceived. On both maintainability and merits, the petition failed and was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 08:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763569</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking indemnification from BCCI was held not maintainable because BCCI was treated as not falling within Article 12 and the claim did not arise from discharge of any public function. The Court also held that a writ of mandamus could not be issued directing BCCI to pay a FEMA penalty imposed on the petitioner, describing that relief as misconceived. On both maintainability and merits, the petition failed and was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>