<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1150 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763570</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s prayer to recall the admission order dated 08.10.2021, finding no error in the decision. Regarding withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of IBC, the tribunal noted that since the Section 7 application was filed by other parties, withdrawal could not be permitted without compliance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A. The tribunal emphasized that Adjudicating Authorities possess inherent jurisdiction to close CIRP proceedings where Section 65 ingredients are attracted, particularly in cases involving fraudulent or malicious applications. The appeal was disposed of with the admission order remaining intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1150 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763570</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s rejection of the appellant&#039;s prayer to recall the admission order dated 08.10.2021, finding no error in the decision. Regarding withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of IBC, the tribunal noted that since the Section 7 application was filed by other parties, withdrawal could not be permitted without compliance with Section 12A read with Regulation 30A. The tribunal emphasized that Adjudicating Authorities possess inherent jurisdiction to close CIRP proceedings where Section 65 ingredients are attracted, particularly in cases involving fraudulent or malicious applications. The appeal was disposed of with the admission order remaining intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>