<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1153 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763573</link>
    <description>The SC upheld a public interest challenge to a toll regime, finding the writ maintainable because the association had sufficient interest and the grievance arose from a continuing levy, so delay and laches did not bar relief. It held that awarding the project without tender was opaque and inconsistent with fairness, and that the power to levy fees or tolls could not be impermissibly sub-delegated to the concessionaire. Article 14 of the Concession Agreement and Annexure F were found contrary to public policy and severable. On the accepted material, project cost and substantial returns had been recovered, so continued collection of user fees or tolls was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 08:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1153 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763573</link>
      <description>The SC upheld a public interest challenge to a toll regime, finding the writ maintainable because the association had sufficient interest and the grievance arose from a continuing levy, so delay and laches did not bar relief. It held that awarding the project without tender was opaque and inconsistent with fairness, and that the power to levy fees or tolls could not be impermissibly sub-delegated to the concessionaire. Article 14 of the Concession Agreement and Annexure F were found contrary to public policy and severable. On the accepted material, project cost and substantial returns had been recovered, so continued collection of user fees or tolls was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>