<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1165 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763585</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 1,56,10,238 under Section 14A following Rule 8D(2) provisions. The tribunal dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding delayed PF contributions, citing SC precedent in Checkmate Services case distinguishing employer and employee contributions. However, ITAT ruled favorably on Section 40(a)(i) disallowance, finding no TDS liability for commission payments to non-resident agents without permanent establishment in India. The tribunal also allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on Section 36(1)(iii) disallowance for CWIP, noting sufficient own funds exceeded CWIP value by 14 times, making notional interest calculation legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 08:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1165 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763585</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs. 1,56,10,238 under Section 14A following Rule 8D(2) provisions. The tribunal dismissed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding delayed PF contributions, citing SC precedent in Checkmate Services case distinguishing employer and employee contributions. However, ITAT ruled favorably on Section 40(a)(i) disallowance, finding no TDS liability for commission payments to non-resident agents without permanent establishment in India. The tribunal also allowed assessee&#039;s appeal on Section 36(1)(iii) disallowance for CWIP, noting sufficient own funds exceeded CWIP value by 14 times, making notional interest calculation legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>