<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 29 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39861</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices under the Income-tax Act were held unsustainable where the earlier assessment had already become time-barred under the 1922 Act, or where no valid regular assessment had been completed, and the later statute could not convert that position into escaped assessment. The Court also noted that full disclosure of primary facts negatived failure-to-disclose jurisdiction, and no genuine belief that income had escaped assessment was shown. Further, the saving provisions for action in consequence of a finding or direction applied only within the scope of the earlier appellate proceeding and against the proper assessee; they did not extend to the firm or an alleged association of persons not covered by that proceeding. The notices and related action were struck down.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:15:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 29 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39861</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices under the Income-tax Act were held unsustainable where the earlier assessment had already become time-barred under the 1922 Act, or where no valid regular assessment had been completed, and the later statute could not convert that position into escaped assessment. The Court also noted that full disclosure of primary facts negatived failure-to-disclose jurisdiction, and no genuine belief that income had escaped assessment was shown. Further, the saving provisions for action in consequence of a finding or direction applied only within the scope of the earlier appellate proceeding and against the proper assessee; they did not extend to the firm or an alleged association of persons not covered by that proceeding. The notices and related action were struck down.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>