https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459662 The appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal due to the amount involved being below the monetary threshold established by CBIC. The Respondent did not present any arguments. The Appellant was represented by legal counsel. The decision was rendered by Members HON'BLE MR. S. S. GARG and HON'BLE MR. P. ANJANI KUMAR. en-us Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2024 21:24:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459662 The appeals were dismissed by the Tribunal due to the amount involved being below the monetary threshold established by CBIC. The Respondent did not present any arguments. The Appellant was represented by legal counsel. The decision was rendered by Members HON'BLE MR. S. S. GARG and HON'BLE MR. P. ANJANI KUMAR. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459662