<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1572 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459663</link>
    <description>A Tribunal order was held unsustainable because it was non-speaking, gave no reasons, and failed to address the appellant&#039;s contentions. The Bombay High Court found that such an order could not stand where material submissions had not been considered. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 21:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=784064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1572 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459663</link>
      <description>A Tribunal order was held unsustainable because it was non-speaking, gave no reasons, and failed to address the appellant&#039;s contentions. The Bombay High Court found that such an order could not stand where material submissions had not been considered. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>