https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84194 The HC held that the Tribunal's decision deleting the addition u/s 68 was justified as the assessee had discharged its burden of substantiating the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions involving receipt of share application money. The HC found no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's factual findings based on evidence. Consequently, the HC declined to interfere with the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee. en-us Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:50 +0530 Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84194 The HC held that the Tribunal's decision deleting the addition u/s 68 was justified as the assessee had discharged its burden of substantiating the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions involving receipt of share application money. The HC found no substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's factual findings based on evidence. Consequently, the HC declined to interfere with the Tribunal's decision in favor of the assessee. Highlights Income Tax Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:50 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84194