<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (2) TMI 30 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39855</link>
    <description>A return filed after the time allowed under section 139(1) or 139(2) could still attract statutory interest, and that interest was treated as a liability created by the Act rather than penalty in the strict sense. The High Court maintained a distinction between charging interest for delay and initiating penalty proceedings under section 271. Filing the return before completion of assessment did not, by itself, erase the earlier default where the relevant test was whether the return had been filed within the time allowed by the Income-tax Officer. The penalty notice was therefore not without jurisdiction or prima facie invalid, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:53:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (2) TMI 30 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39855</link>
      <description>A return filed after the time allowed under section 139(1) or 139(2) could still attract statutory interest, and that interest was treated as a liability created by the Act rather than penalty in the strict sense. The High Court maintained a distinction between charging interest for delay and initiating penalty proceedings under section 271. Filing the return before completion of assessment did not, by itself, erase the earlier default where the relevant test was whether the return had been filed within the time allowed by the Income-tax Officer. The penalty notice was therefore not without jurisdiction or prima facie invalid, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>