https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763510 Complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act against a company officer require a specific averment that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business at the relevant time. On scrutiny, the complaints lacked that mandatory factual foundation, so continuation of the proceedings was treated as an abuse of process. The complaints, summoning orders, orders refusing discharge, and consequential proceedings against the appellant were quashed. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763510 Complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act against a company officer require a specific averment that the accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business at the relevant time. On scrutiny, the complaints lacked that mandatory factual foundation, so continuation of the proceedings was treated as an abuse of process. The complaints, summoning orders, orders refusing discharge, and consequential proceedings against the appellant were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763510