<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1094 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763514</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned tax order demanding service tax of Rs. 2,88,39,550 and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to present relevant records to the authorities, allowing them to reassess the case. The Court found no explicit evidence of fraud or suppression, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1094 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763514</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned tax order demanding service tax of Rs. 2,88,39,550 and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to present relevant records to the authorities, allowing them to reassess the case. The Court found no explicit evidence of fraud or suppression, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>