<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1099 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763519</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the restoration of appeal filed by a private limited company after the appellant failed to appear for seven scheduled hearings. The appellant waited one year after their previous advocate withdrew to appoint new counsel, only engaging representation after the final order was issued. CESTAT held that restoration of appeal is not a matter of right and requires exceptional circumstances with valid reasons. The Tribunal noted it had already exceeded the statutory requirement of three adjournments by offering seven opportunities, yet the appellant consistently failed to appear without justifiable cause, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1099 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763519</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the restoration of appeal filed by a private limited company after the appellant failed to appear for seven scheduled hearings. The appellant waited one year after their previous advocate withdrew to appoint new counsel, only engaging representation after the final order was issued. CESTAT held that restoration of appeal is not a matter of right and requires exceptional circumstances with valid reasons. The Tribunal noted it had already exceeded the statutory requirement of three adjournments by offering seven opportunities, yet the appellant consistently failed to appear without justifiable cause, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>