<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763522</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned Order-in-Original dated 4 November 2024, citing a violation of natural justice due to the unjustified rejection of the petitioner&#039;s adjournment request. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh hearing, with proceedings to conclude by 31 March 2025. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 50,000 to Tata Memorial Hospital within two weeks, with the remand contingent on this payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763522</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned Order-in-Original dated 4 November 2024, citing a violation of natural justice due to the unjustified rejection of the petitioner&#039;s adjournment request. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh hearing, with proceedings to conclude by 31 March 2025. The petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 50,000 to Tata Memorial Hospital within two weeks, with the remand contingent on this payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>