<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal concerning the jurisdictional issue under Section 153A, as the assessee did not pursue it. However, it allowed the appeal regarding mechanical approval under Section 153D, quashing the assessment because the approval was deemed purely mechanical. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for separate and independent approval for each assessment year and assessee, aligning with statutory mandates and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 08:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1107 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal concerning the jurisdictional issue under Section 153A, as the assessee did not pursue it. However, it allowed the appeal regarding mechanical approval under Section 153D, quashing the assessment because the approval was deemed purely mechanical. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for separate and independent approval for each assessment year and assessee, aligning with statutory mandates and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>