<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1482 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459650</link>
    <description>The listed income-tax appeals were treated as covered by the Court&#039;s earlier orders dated 11 February 2019 and 15 July 2019, which had already disposed of the controversy raised. As no subsisting issue remained for adjudication, the Court held that nothing survived in these appeals and disposed them as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1482 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459650</link>
      <description>The listed income-tax appeals were treated as covered by the Court&#039;s earlier orders dated 11 February 2019 and 15 July 2019, which had already disposed of the controversy raised. As no subsisting issue remained for adjudication, the Court held that nothing survived in these appeals and disposed them as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>