<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1593 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459658</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, and the Supreme Court then examined the matter on merits under Article 136. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction, the Court found no case for interference and dismissed the petition. The order reflects that condonation enabled substantive consideration, but the issues raised did not justify invocation of special leave jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1593 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459658</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned, and the Supreme Court then examined the matter on merits under Article 136. Exercising its discretionary jurisdiction, the Court found no case for interference and dismissed the petition. The order reflects that condonation enabled substantive consideration, but the issues raised did not justify invocation of special leave jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>