<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 439 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459630</link>
    <description>An election could not be voided on the basis of speeches made by persons other than the returned candidate without compliance with the statutory notice-and-inquiry requirement. The candidate&#039;s own speeches were found innocuous, and speeches made before she formally entered the contest could not themselves establish corrupt practice against her. Where liability is sought vicariously for another person&#039;s act said to have been done with the candidate&#039;s consent, a clear finding of consent and observance of the statutory procedure are required before an adverse conclusion can be recorded. As those safeguards were not met, and the candidate&#039;s own conduct was not objectionable, the judgment setting aside the election was reversed and remand was unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 439 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459630</link>
      <description>An election could not be voided on the basis of speeches made by persons other than the returned candidate without compliance with the statutory notice-and-inquiry requirement. The candidate&#039;s own speeches were found innocuous, and speeches made before she formally entered the contest could not themselves establish corrupt practice against her. Where liability is sought vicariously for another person&#039;s act said to have been done with the candidate&#039;s consent, a clear finding of consent and observance of the statutory procedure are required before an adverse conclusion can be recorded. As those safeguards were not met, and the candidate&#039;s own conduct was not objectionable, the judgment setting aside the election was reversed and remand was unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>