<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459626</link>
    <description>The HC directed the sugar manufacturers to deposit excess realisations, accrued under interim orders, into the Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund within three months, with interest. The court utilized its inherent jurisdiction to rectify undue advantages gained during the interim period, rejecting arguments against its authority under Section 141 CPC. Petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 121 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459626</link>
      <description>The HC directed the sugar manufacturers to deposit excess realisations, accrued under interim orders, into the Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund within three months, with interest. The court utilized its inherent jurisdiction to rectify undue advantages gained during the interim period, rejecting arguments against its authority under Section 141 CPC. Petitions were allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>