<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court: Additions Based on Third-Party Material Not Permissible u/s 153A Without Incriminating Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84160</link>
    <description>Assessments u/s 153A for AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 &amp; 2014-15 were made based on statement of third party and material from search of third party, without any incriminating material found in assessee&#039;s case. As per SC ruling in Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell, such additions are impermissible u/s 153A. For abated AYs 2015-16 onwards, AO&#039;s powers aren&#039;t limited to incriminating material from search. However, where AO accepted assessee&#039;s explanation on source of funds based on documentary evidence in remand report, CIT(A) erred in brushing it aside without substantive reasons. Additions sustained by CIT(A) despite AO&#039;s findings in remand report are unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Additions Based on Third-Party Material Not Permissible u/s 153A Without Incriminating Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84160</link>
      <description>Assessments u/s 153A for AYs 2012-13, 2013-14 &amp; 2014-15 were made based on statement of third party and material from search of third party, without any incriminating material found in assessee&#039;s case. As per SC ruling in Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell, such additions are impermissible u/s 153A. For abated AYs 2015-16 onwards, AO&#039;s powers aren&#039;t limited to incriminating material from search. However, where AO accepted assessee&#039;s explanation on source of funds based on documentary evidence in remand report, CIT(A) erred in brushing it aside without substantive reasons. Additions sustained by CIT(A) despite AO&#039;s findings in remand report are unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 08:46:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=84160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>