<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1011 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763431</link>
    <description>The Jharkhand HC dismissed an application seeking condonation of 404 days delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. Despite the judgment being pronounced on 27.02.2023, the file moved between tables and officers from 03.04.2023 to 30.04.2024. The court found the applicant adopted a lethargic attitude and was negligent, noting they were aware of the appeal period. The court concluded sufficient cause was not shown to condone the substantial delay and dismissed the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1011 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763431</link>
      <description>The Jharkhand HC dismissed an application seeking condonation of 404 days delay in filing a Letters Patent Appeal. Despite the judgment being pronounced on 27.02.2023, the file moved between tables and officers from 03.04.2023 to 30.04.2024. The court found the applicant adopted a lethargic attitude and was negligent, noting they were aware of the appeal period. The court concluded sufficient cause was not shown to condone the substantial delay and dismissed the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>