<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763434</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the National Commission&#039;s order that reduced the insurance amount payable to the appellant. The court held that both District and State Commissions had concurrently found the delay in intimation to be justified and that vehicle damage occurred in two phases - initial accident and subsequent short-circuiting. The National Commission exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by interfering with concurrent findings of fact without establishing any illegality or material irregularity in the State Commission&#039;s approach. The State Commission had properly examined all evidence, including rejecting the surveyor&#039;s report for lack of evidence, and correctly directed payment of the entire insured sum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763434</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the National Commission&#039;s order that reduced the insurance amount payable to the appellant. The court held that both District and State Commissions had concurrently found the delay in intimation to be justified and that vehicle damage occurred in two phases - initial accident and subsequent short-circuiting. The National Commission exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by interfering with concurrent findings of fact without establishing any illegality or material irregularity in the State Commission&#039;s approach. The State Commission had properly examined all evidence, including rejecting the surveyor&#039;s report for lack of evidence, and correctly directed payment of the entire insured sum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>