<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1016 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763436</link>
    <description>The SC held that recovery proceedings by the Civil Supplies Corporation against rice millers for unaccounted rice deposits constituted a valid public demand under the Act. The court found that section 3(6) defines public demand broadly to include arrears mentioned in Schedule I, and the transaction involving procurement, milling, and distribution of public grain fell within this ambit. While the certificate officer had jurisdiction to initiate recovery proceedings, the court noted procedural violations and non-adherence to natural justice principles. The SC dismissed the appeal but granted rice millers thirty days to avail statutory remedies under the Act without limitation period restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=783776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1016 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763436</link>
      <description>The SC held that recovery proceedings by the Civil Supplies Corporation against rice millers for unaccounted rice deposits constituted a valid public demand under the Act. The court found that section 3(6) defines public demand broadly to include arrears mentioned in Schedule I, and the transaction involving procurement, milling, and distribution of public grain fell within this ambit. While the certificate officer had jurisdiction to initiate recovery proceedings, the court noted procedural violations and non-adherence to natural justice principles. The SC dismissed the appeal but granted rice millers thirty days to avail statutory remedies under the Act without limitation period restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>